Perspectives on Human Nature
Our emotions and feelings are energetic interpretations of the mind related to a particular situation, the concept that we create, the ideas, symbols, all of that is the consequence of not knowing how to deal with our reality, as our experience is that of an interpretation, of who and what we should be accordingly to one moment, as the result of the extensive amount of resistance, fear, uncertainty, what have we done? We have closed ourselves in our minds of knowledge, information, values, emotions and feelings, and we try to mold everything to create the picture, the idea, the reality that we would prefer to experience, because we don´t know how to deal with what is here. With the years, all that becomes compressed into memories that we place as the starting point of our actions, our actions actually being defined through consequences, and the consequences being that of what we do, we speak and think.
The situation is that as we have followed the interpretation of our minds, our emotions and feelings without really understanding how the things really work, we have created many consequences deriving in many wars and forms of conflict, and in a very interesting way, we have secluded ourselves in the concepts and ideas that apparently can brings us happiness and fulfillment accordingly to our desires, yet the consequence today is that the earth is being destroyed, the animals are being destroyed, why? Because our relationship to everything that is here has not been understood, our responsibility for ourselves, for who we are, and within that we have become that of conflict, of no understanding or direction, yet, we deny and resist the possibility of giving up our minds, our knowledge, our concept, ideas, we fear to CHANGE, why? Fear, we fear to take responsibility and to face that which exist within us as conflict, the relationship to this world, because we think that “it’s just too much”, yet, it’s not so much as “one thinks”, because the experience within ourselves can seem very overwhelming, yet, it’s important to understand that the creation that one is experiencing within one’s mind, is completely a personal interpretation, it doesn´t have anything to be with the situation itself, because the experience is not coming from the situation, is coming from self, and of course, for the mind to be able to sustain itself, it have to think, and for that one makes oneself believe that one is the thoughts and you know, one goes into the claiming of, “I know who I am”, yet, ¿how can we know who we are if who we are has become that of searching and of not knowing who we are? If one really knew who one is, you would never have doubts, or conflict within you, this world would not be what it is today…
That is why any person focusing only on being positive is creating more harm and abuse in this world without having a fucking idea of how he/she is doing it…, because the positivity only leads to suppression, to denial, to resistance. Positivity is the creation of the personal world, the personal imagination of perfection, “perfection only dependent and derived from the consequences of the concepts that one have in regards to this world”, the positivity is only how we would like to experience ourselves, nevertheless, is not a solution, why? The situation is that, the problem in one´s life remains the same, and the mind is not able to operate or function in a reality in which one is creating a concept completely deluded of what is actually required to be faced. It’s the same as if one expected to fly jumping from a mountain without a parachute. In relation to our current system, the positivism in itself, following the rules that we have perceived is what keeps the system functioning, because it apparently regulates our behavior and our relationship to everything to take us to the “perfect state of mind” which is…happiness…something that you must understand about the social contract that has been constantly and continuously taken from the classical (Rousseau, Montesquieu, Aristotle) to the moderns (Jurgen Habbermas, Niklas Luhnmann, Stefan Molyneux, etc.), what we have accepted and allowed, what has manifested in this world, is only due to our starting point in relation to ourselves, as human beings.
It’s quite interesting when one sees that everything about the laws, politics, economics, is about the defense of the personal interests, and you know, when we see our politicians, layers, economist, we tend to think that, you know, greedy bastards they are taking all the money away, they are only defending their self-interests, and yes, you can be quite sure that they are doing it, yet, “who is allowing it?”, who created this in its personal relationship to our partner, friends, family?
What we can see in regards to the social contract, is that in the beginning of the first civilizations, there was a fascinating point in regards to the “social role that each and every single one of us was going to play”, this can be better understood if you look at how the first civilizations begun to develop quicker and begun to resolve the problems that one man by himself, will would never be able to achieve, I mean, that was the point (to work together for a particular interest =survival from other civilizations and principally nature but I will get to that point), yet, to achieve that, everyone was standing within particular principles, and I mean, yes, the principles were completely dependent of your cultural basis, specially the family; the structure was more a military regime than a society as we understand it today, the families were so big and so deeply integrated in such principles that if you didn´t obey the rules, your father (this is specific) was allowed to kill you if he wanted to do so. But before assuming anything coming to your mind, first of all, I want you to look at this, the first societies were completely rudimentary, this means that the richest person had a bunch of slaves and a couple of mules, this of course in the monarchy, which at the end of this period of most of the societies the wealth increased to such an extent that of course, it was something “more common” to see a person with 50 slaves and 20 mules than someone dying of hunger (this is the case of the slaves of course, because they were “there” you know, but they were not regarded as citizens as they were supposed to be even less than animals, they were inferior by definition accordingly to many aspects within the culture, religion, politics and so on, and so on).
At the end of the Monarchy, comes the Republic, which was the standing of the people against the dictatorship of the man that was the “State and the Government”, when the people made their stand demanding the recognition of the social contract, they took the position of the state and “the emperor” took the position of the government, the people determines the state and the emperor makes this will of the state to be fulfilled by force…this marks the principle of the ought, or “what should be”. Something very interesting can be seen in regards to the story of Abraham the founding father of the Israelites, with a prominent role in Judaism, Christianity and Islam; this man that was “commanded” by God to kill his own son, to payback a debt to the creator of the Universe and to prove his love to that god, within this god is the government and that debt represents the obedience to the government, which is actually only the will of the state.
In our minds the principle of “this debt functions in exactly the same way” the energy of the thoughts, is a program running, voices in the head, chats with the personal memories as Bernard Poolman explains, everything being based on knowledge and information, judgments, emotions and feelings, but not actually being oneself who determines the decision of the movement that one makes, because is being delegated to the thoughts, energies, and within that, one is not able to claim that one has independency or even individuality, for this I suggest you to read the blog of Bernard Poolman on the point of Right to Individuality
Bernard Poolman – Day 366: The Human Right of Individuality
“Yes, have a look: this is the One Thing Everyone Desires: Individuality, Free Choice, Free Speech.
Obviously, the Principle of Individuality is the Fact that One can Express it in a Unique Individual Way, but there is One Thing to Consider: If your Individuality Impose on another’s – making them either a Master or a Slave, then Individuality No Longer Exists. Then Individuality Becomes ‘Master’ or ‘Slave’.
Thus, a Fundamental Right for Each One from the Moment of Your Existence within Awareness is Individuality and the Consideration that: If You Express this Individuality in a way that Relates to others with Respect and Equality, with Respecting their Individuality and thus Doing and Participating within All Things in a way that is Best for Other Individuals as well – they’re going to Respond by Respecting your Individuality.
If you Don’t, then you have a World like Now where No-one Respects another’s Individuality, Nobody Respects another’s Right to Life – because Everybody is Scared of Everyone Else, because Each One Knows One Thing: You will Rather Act in Self Interest, because You Already Expect Everyone else to Do the Same. Instead of Reversing it, Instead of Realizing that: “As You Give = You Receive”.
You see, the Message of Jesus was the Ultimate Model of Individuality: “Give as You Would Like to Receive”, “Do Onto Another as You Would Like to be Done Unto” – The Foundation Principle of Individuality. If You Do Not Have this Principle Intrinsic as Your Own Self Value, then you’re Not an Individual – Yet.
First you Must Establish this Principle, then Individuality can be Born and you May at Last be Called Alive.” –Bernard Poolman-
As long as one experience fear or any emotion, feeling, reaction, picture in the head, one is not self-responsible and within this, the dependency to thoughts, emotions and feelings are establishing the principles for self this can be seen in regards to the processes of the brain in the creation and generation of stimulus that direct the human being to a phase of aggression, what can be seen is that we have an specific area of the brain that turns into a mode of activation when we are in front of particular situations in our life, our world, yet this specific area of the brain it’s also activated in regards to the process of physical activities in which we place our maximum input, (so to speak) to attain a particular result. One could also say that is quite interesting to see that we have come to believe that for us to get a particular result, we must force that result through energy, by energy I am referring to the force of coercion = government.
If you see how our human civilization has grown, everything is a point in regards to self-interest, this means commodities, and you know, the things are being done by the state and technology, in the beginning of the monarchy was something different (not because it was a good government, lol), but because the people had to actively participate in everything, each and every single one of them, there not “something been done for you”, this is the reason why everyone lived in regards to the principles of a military regime, because as more cultures were dominated and slaved, more commodities one was able to had…actually the same principle still operates today from the Fiscal laws to the War. And what has happened today? As everything is done for us in our minds, in the “government” with no social responsibility at all, all the money goes to the government, and the people is getting more and more poor… the same happens in the mind, as more energy we give to the mind, is more and more the depletion the diseases, hasn´t being said that the 99% of the diseases are created by the mind or through vicious patterns that begun on the mind?
Something similar can be seen in the brain in regards to the processes of pain, which has been discovered that the same area of the brain is activated in presence of emotional pain as it is with physical pain, something really interesting here, is that, when a human being receives emotional or physical pain, the reaction that is properly seen in terms of “how a human being will interact with his/her emotions and feelings” is that we will go into an emotional reaction which can be suppressed (which will provoke eventually the inner destruction of the person or the discharge of that anger onto someone else) or can also lead to physical action.
If you see what happens in martial arts, the physical application of strength can be measured in terms of the input that one has to apply to make the movement that will allow you to break through the resistance of your opponent in combat; that is still able to be directed by the human if one trains and prepares oneself to do so. Yet, while one is on rage, the sensorial perception decreases, accordingly to this, when two men are fighting, they are able to resist a lot of pain without being aware of it; taking into consideration the current state of existence of our society, we are in a constant and continuous state of conflict within our minds, which implies that we are continuously prepared to fight.
Consider the amount of thoughts that you have in a day, positive or negative it’s the same cause they play part of the polarity that will lead you to create continuous states of conflict within yourself, which implies that one will not be able to survive without “that” which gives you control over the situation, you must get that which you want, need and desire, and therefore the operant stimulus which gives you a sense of control is (in the case of this system) “money”.
Something interesting occurs with money, and this is that the people can get very frustrated when they don´t have money, there you have your relationship of need, want, desire, etc., as your stimulus related to a piece of paper and you have in the other hand the experience of fear of survival, competition and (very important) Physical Pain, if you don´t have money, you will not be able to buy food, or pay for goods or services and you will starve, that is a fact. It´s so interesting that if we don´t get what we want, need or desire, we become frustrated and angry, which can lead us to physical action in various forms of aggression, call it to steal, to murder, to manipulate and you can also add determination to do what is required to be done, the way in which that is done…will depend of multiple factors, yet the main of them, will be your economical position within this system, the principles…well, there is a problem with the principles of “morality”, and this is that, one is always able to “reason the personal morality as valid or not accordingly to the self-interests…fascinating…”
The question is: Are we going to give more morals to the people only because we don´t want them to steal our wallets or are we going to get sure that everyone receives what they physically need to sustain themselves? That will be the absolute solution to the prevention of crime in this world, nobody will have to steal, or murder, or manipulate their fellow man.
The stimulus is learned, through the constant operant “nature” of our parents and society around us, everything equated in our own minds accordingly to the self-interests, yet, it can also be changed.
Some people differs from this perspective because it is stated that the fact that aggression is dependent of an external impulse and that is “also learned” in regards to the relationships of concepts, ideas, etc., that we create from a particular situation or that we also learn from our parents or other people (society) on the multiple definitions of what is good, bad, right, wrong; cannot determine that the body does not require of an aggressive behavior and cannot explain why it that we get satisfaction from aggression.
If you look at the theory of the psychoanalysis, in regards to the point of aggression in which it is pointed out, how we project violence towards others because when we were children we were punished by our parents and therefore we find satisfaction when we punish or harm other people because it kind of gives you the perception of control of power over your life.
Yet if you look at how the children are teach to be and behave over the moral basis of good and bad, right and wrong, you will see something very interesting in regards to that “sense of satisfaction that we get from the aggressive behavior; the suppression that takes place on a certain behavior is pretended to be reinforced by an stimulus of satisfaction operating in relation to particular concepts, ideas, behaviors, yet, the “emptiness” that many people have stated to experience in regards to their life, when multiple dimensions of suppression in regards to work, family, relationships, sex are operating at the same time, this creates particular experiences within the people that they relate or refer as an experience of depression, anxiety, or also constantly being described as “an emptiness”, reflects that those areas in which we have being told to keep ourselves apart from exploring them, you are supposed to not express yourself in a “nasty way”, so to speak, that creates a form of suppression, yet, instead of facing the problem, expressing yourself and what it is that is creating conflict within you, you are told to just adapt to the situation and obey to the rules of the society, what do we do? “We try to compensate them by thinking nasty things about the people around you” and when this things manifest, the people go: “Oh no, that person is dangerous, that person is evil, the world is becoming crazy, is becoming mad”. Nevertheless, this is happening within each and every single one of us, but we don´t want to see it, we don´t want to express it, why? Because we are afraid of going mad, we are afraid of going to the jail and being judged for a crime, when actually, we are deluding ourselves by not seeing deliberately, the harm that we are creating towards all the people in the world, by removing them from our consideration while we take all the resources of the earth, wasting them in pure bullshit, getting to the point of throwing tons of food to the garbage, because we are not even able to consume everything that we are stealing from other people…
I suggest you to read the blogs of Lindsay Craver, she is walking the complete dimensions of Coercive control in the areas of psychology:
Here is a fragment of her blog in which she is walking a vision of self-honesty in regards to the coercive control, from the book of Murray Sidman.
“As we shall see in a later chapter, such training gives rise to what we like to call our conscience. Supposedly our sense of right and wrong, our conscience is really only a sense of wrong; it develops initially, directly from coercive control.
Like the various freedoms, which signify the absence of related forms of coercion, ‘right’ can be defined only in contrast with ‘wrong.’ We first learn that we can do wrong when, as children, we experience punishment for some of our actions. If we were never punished, all of our conduct would be right, but because wrong would then be an unnecessary concept, the contrasting notion of right would also never arise. Nor would the notion of conscience.” (43) ~ [*] Murray Sidman, excerpt from his book Coercion and Its Fallout
This ‘training’ that Sidman is referring to, which gives rise to our conscience – this is the policeman in our head. The policeman essentially dictates ‘the law’ that has been laid down primarily by our parents when we are children, which is ‘the law of right and wrong.’ It is here that we begin to develop our own personal, internal self-punishment system; it is here that we begin developing the framework which will soon become our multiple personalities/characters, and it is here that we separate ourselves from our direct relationship with this physical reality to instead cater our behavior to these simulated internal voices of right and wrong thus creating a veneer over reality and in effect shut out our actual, commonsensical self-expression as who we are as a physical, living being – equal and one to all life that is here – not a programmed robot geared for a system of enslavement far removed from reality as what we have allowed ourselves to become.
As Sidman states, our conscience is birthed directly from coercive control – and, as I mentioned in my previous post, this coercive control can also be found in what Sidman attempts to offer as a solution as well, which is paying children to behave themselves instead of expecting children to be good because ‘it’s the right thing to do’ as was the argument by religious leaders that Sidman made reference to.
In the context of paying children to behave themselves, the child develops their conscience primarily through reinforcement/reward thus, just like the opposite of right is wrong, the opposite of reinforcement/reward is punishment. Sidman states that right can only exist when contrasted with wrong, yet this is also the case with reinforcement as it can only exist when contrasted with punishment. If we were never punished, our conduct would not require to be reinforced, it would simply stand as a complete expression without contingency, which would then make punishment an unnecessary concept and by default reinforcement would also cease to arise, along with the notion of conscience and so the policeman in the head would be no more.
With Sidman’s proposed method the child learns that they are doing right when they get a reward, when they get paid, when they get stuff like toys and candy and treats, when they are given the ‘freedom to consume.’ They then come to believe they are doing wrong when they do not get these things, or when these things get taken away. Thus again, the behavior is conditionally contingent on a reward, not on an actual understanding of the behavior, on the nature of consequence and thus it is a form of coercion as it is essentially forcing the child to do something that the parent deems as right in order to get something else and so the internal friction starts to arise. Sometimes the parent themselves will then turn into an aversive stimulus to be avoided unless a reward is secured and if this pairing happens on enough occasions it can indeed serve to destroy any real relationship between parent and child. –Lindsay Craver-
Is not that the Human Nature is not able to change, is just that we are holding onto our self-interests, a survival that is no longer necessary, in the beginning we had gods as the principle of superiority in our minds, to also keep the lowest point, the inferiority that allow us to play the victim and justify our violence towards others, today the same principle is playing out, god being money, and we remaining in survival, still justifying our violence, our inconsideration for the people suffering.
Esta entrada fue publicada en Sin categoría y etiquetada como . desteniespanol, 2012, 2013, 7 years blog, 7 years journey to life blogs, 7 years to life process, A, añoranza, abamperes, abandoned, abandoner, abasement, abashment, abatement, abattises, abattoirs, able, aboard, about, above, abrazo, absence, abuso, abuso familiar, accept, accident, accomplish, according, account, across, act, action, add, addiction, addition, address, adopt, advices, affair, afraid, afro, after, afternoon, again, against, age, ago, agreement, agua, air, alba, albahaca, Albert Einstein, alborada, alegria, alféizar, algarabía, alhelí, alike, all, allege, allow, alma, almohada, almost, alone, along, already, also, amanecer, amapola, amar, amigo, amistad, amor, anal, anger, animales, anuncios, anxiety, apathy, appreciation, armonía, ass, assumptions, aurora, Avaricia, aviation, azahar, azul, beautiful, beautiful clown, beautiful things, belleza, Bernard Poolman, beso, Big Bang, Bill of Rights, blogs juridicos, blogs of freedom, blood revenge, body, body of a woman, boundaries, burbuja, butt, caleidoscopio, cancer, capitalism, capitalistic system, cariño, caricia, celebrities, celso, Child growing, childs, chocolate, chromosome x, cielo, ciencia, circus, clow journey to life, Clown, clown pictures, clowns, commitment, common sense, communism, community, competencia, compra, conformation, consciousness, constructs, control, control fear, convenient, convention, convict, copy, corazón, cordially, cost, could, country, couples, course, court, cousins, cover, creation, creativity, crepúsculo, cristal, crowd, cultura, culture, current-events, cut, dad, damn thing, dark, dash, date, dating, daughter, day, de amor, dead, deal, dear, death, debate, December, decide, decision, declare, deep, degree, deity, delay, department, derecho, derecho civil, derecho de familia, derecho romano, derechos de los niños, derechos fundamentales, Derechos Humanos, deseo, desire, desteni, desteni español, desteniiprocess, destiny, destroy, develop, diamond, did, dinero, dios, disempowerment, disguise, dislike, documentaries, dominion, drugs, drugs and alcohol, drumroll, dulzura, eagerness, ealdorman, ealdormen, earliness, earlships, earlywood, earmarked, earnestly, earphones, earpieces, Economy, ecstasy, edictos, educacion, education, education system, educational experience, educational system, Effective child growing, ego, Egoísmo, el matrimonio, elite, emotions, empatía, End of the world, energetic experience, enlightenment, entertainment, entire world, equal life, equal life foundation, equal money, equal money system, Equal Rights = Equal Responsibilities, equal-money.org, equalcapitalism, equality, equality consideration, equalmoney, erotic pictures, esclavitud, esperanza, estrella, eternity, experience happiness, exponential numbers, expression, eye tooth, fabricant, fabricate, fabulists, facecloth, facedowns, facelifts, facemasks, faceplate, facetious, facetting, fail, failure, familia, familia antigua, familia civil, familias, family, fantasía, fantasies, farm, father, fe, fear of death, fear of failure, fear of lose, feelings, felicidad, fire, fired, forgiveness, Freedom, friends, fulfillment, full attention, fun, funny clown, gaming, girls, give up, giving up, gobierno, God, goodness, gracias, Graciela, great, guerra, guilt, hallazgo, handsome, hard, has, hat, have, he, head, health, hear, heard, heart, heaven, height, held, help, her, here, herself, high, hijo, him, himself, his, historia, History, history biology, hobbes, hold, hombre, hombres, home, homosexual, honesty, honor, hope, horse, hot, hour, house, how, however, human, human emotions, human nature, Human Rights, humanidad, humanitarianism, humildad, hurt, husband, I, ice, ideas, if, igualdad, ilusion, imagination, imbecile, incapibility, industrial revolution, inferiority, information values, Injusticia, iusnaturalismo, Javier Hervada, jazmín, joke, journey to life blogs, juicio, Julieta Zochi, justicia, justification, justifications, Ken Cousens, la norma, la responsabilidad, laagering, labdanums, labelable, labellers, labelling, labialize, laborious, laborites, labourers, labouring, lapislázuli, latin, law of attraction, law of balance, law of retaliation, lágrima, lealtad, lesbian, leyes, libélula, libertad, lie, life, like, lips, little bit, lluvia, los dioses, lose, lost, love, love relationships, luciérnaga, luna, luz, madre, magia, male ego, male egos, mamá, mandarina, manifestation, mar, mariposa, Marlen Vargas del Razo, masturbation, mathematical equations, mathematics history, música, medicine, mediocrity, melancolía, memories, mental reality, mental relationship, mental-health, mente, miedo, mimes, models, money, mother, motivational speech, muerte, mujer, mujeres, murciélago, naked, narcissistic personality, naturaleza, Naturaleza Humana, negative experience, negative experiences, new age, new way, New World Order, nexo, nose, nostalgia, oakmosses, oarfishes, oarswoman, oarswomen, oasthouse, obbligati, obbligato, obcordate, obeahisms, obedience, official, often, ojalá, old, omit, on, once, one, Oneness and Equality, only, open, opinion, or, order, organization, organize, organizing, origen, other, ought, our, out, outside, over, own, page, paid, paint, pair, palabra, paper, pareja, parental control, Parental education, parents, parents and their children, part, particular, party, pasión, pass, past, pay, paz, peliculas, people, perdón, perfect, perhaps, period, personal, personal belongings, personalities, perspectiva, physical, poder, point of conflict, polarity, politics, por lo tanto, porn, pornography, power, primavera, primitivas, productos, purpose, pussy, qindarkas, quaaludes, quackisms, quadrants, quadrated, quadrates, quadratic, quadrigae, quadrille, quadrivia, Quality, Quality of Life, quit, quotes, real shit, realization, reasons, red, rejections, relationships, religion, religious basis, resistance, respeto, responsabilidad, Responsibility, revistas, Robert Olivart, rocío, Rodolfo L. Vigo, ruina, sabadilla, sabbatics, sabiduría, sablefish, sabotaged, sabotages, saboteurs, saccharin, sacculate, sackcloth, sacrament, sadness, salud, satanista, school, schoolmate, schoolmates, self forgiveness, sensation, sentimiento, serenidad, sex, sex and relationships, SEXO, sexual, sexuality, sexy, share comments, silencio, sin embargo, sinceridad, sistema, smile, soñar, socialism, sociedad, society, sol, soledad, solidaridad, something, sometimes, son, song, sonrisa, soon, sorry, sorry for the delay, sound frequency, south, speak, special, specialness, spell, spend, spent, spirituality, spring, stamp, stand, stardust, stars, start, state, statement, station, stay, steamer, still, stole, stone, stood, stop, stopped, story, street, strong, struck, study, studying, sublime, success, such, sudden, sueño, suffer, suggest, Sunette a.k.a Winged, superclown, superior, supernove, susurro, teachers, television, tendencies, ternura, the secret, the secret to life, theology, Theory, tip of the iceberg, tits, todas las leyes, tolerancia, transportation, trough, truth, turmoil, ungrateful, ungrateful son, universal laws, universe, universo, utopía, vacancies, vacations, vaccinate, vaccinees, vaccinial, vaccinias, vacillate, vacuities, vacuolate, vacuously, vagina, value of money, verdad, victimization, vida, videogames, vinculo agnaticio, vinculo cognaticio, vinculo jurídico, vinculo sangineo, violacion, violencia, voice tonality, wealth and posted in creative writing, win, woman, women, work, world equality, x y chromosomes.